would you rather have more things to do in the game or not?
1 Like
Whatās your point exactly?
1 Like
would you like to have an empty base, which after you have cleared out enough places that you can stay relaxed, or would you like to have the town populated and them sending you on quests ect.
.
Yes I understand how hard it will be to do, but it could have some interesting things happen with it. I want your true opinion. Do you like the idea of building a base to house people, or do you like building a base to just house yourself.
.
Btw, no, I dont want this in multiplayer. I would like to see it in singleplayer because the fact that singleplayer can be pretty boring when you feel by yourself. just a touch of more life other than non moving people and zombies helps a lot.
1 Like
Boo singleplayer, multiplayer is where itās at.
1 Like
What you want may be a thing in singleplayer, though it would require extra work from Nelson.
And well, my idea is really meant to work in multiplayer very well: you can claim a house or store by yourself or with your friend; for a large store or small warehouse, 3 people or more; for police stations, schools, hospitals (any public service building, assuming these will be much larger in 4.x), maybe +4 or +5 people, and so onā¦ Reaching a reasonable top of +8 players for apartments and office buildings, and maybe like +10 for prisons, military bases and/or airports, etc.
I forgot to mention that my idea opens tons of possibilities for RP servers, on which players could keep and maintain a small or medium town claimed all by and for themselves (also assuming player limit in servers will be increased as well).
EDIT: maybe buildings arenāt that large, so there would be the need to lower the players amount I just stated here, lol.
1 Like
IMO, I prefer playing just with friends and surviving in a strict PvE setting. I know people love PvP and all, but itās just something I cannot get into, and besides, 4.x will have a bigger focus on the PvE aspect. Just my two rubles.
2 Likes
Rubles
It should be Kopecks, you rich bastard!
Jokes aside, PvP is always fun as long as people donāt just kill you on sight. Seriously, raiding is fun as well, gives you a thrill.
Hopefully multiplayer wonāt instantly imply CRAZY PVP in Unturned II, so when we speak about multiplayer, donāt expect silly definitions, just the bare and simple one:
Multiplayer: modality of videogames that allows you to play with other people.
Just that. Unturned II will have inmensely PvE aspects overhauled by default. 
1 Like
ROFLMFAO XDD
1 Like
Have you ever heard of āHereās my two dollars on the subject?ā No, itās always cents.
2 Rubles= 3 cents 
(Yes I know I screwed up)
But I understand the multiplayer aspect will be way better in 4.x, but a basic fact of the internet, is that there will always be jerks that only seek you out to ruin your day.
2 Likes
And that is why guns exist.
yeah well npcs would replace players in singleplayer. we want singleplayer to actually be fun, not some boring af thingt hat nobody plays again.
1 Like
Even as tasteless as Unturnedās singleplayer it was, I spent tons of hours in it, lol.
2 Likes
Are you talking about Canada specifically or including the entire history of the world? I donāt know much about the former, (I try to stay as far from Quebec as possible,) but I am fairly certain the latter would be untrue.
America mainly but some other countries follow these kind of prisons.
Heck, this prison was built in the 1830s and improved upon through out the centuries. (New Jersey State Prison)
But this prison (the Maze Prison) was constructed in 1971, and you will note, it does not have walls, but high fences instead. (Built in Northern Ireland)
Welcome to PEI
I couldnāt find any Canadian prisons, because everyone is just so darn nice :).
Whoa bro, what about the Canadians in the revolutionary war? They burned down the whitehouse.
Uhm, correct my history if Iām wrong, but Canada only got itās independence in 1867, meaning that the Canadians could not have possibly burned down the whitehouse.
But maybe you are thinking of the French? However, the French were still on the Americanās side and even supported the Americans with Troops, Guns, and Generals (Lafayette).