
What dose adding signatures even mean?
Not sure but signatures probably mean putting your name at the end of a post. As for the thread itself someone made a strangely long post about âUnturned Youtubersâ and when P9nda joined in OP started being well less then ârespectfulâ towards him and you can see Yarrâs final sentence helps to summarize what happened.
I donât know the extent of asking stuff like this is allowed, and how much youâre supposed to answer it (someone please tell me) but the thread is right there for you too read if youâre that curious, itâs not that concerning anyways, just a thread getting out of hand.
Pretty much this. OP has a massive bone to pick with Unturned YouTubers and when P9nda showed up OP saw the red mist and went for his throat. Cue flamewar all around.
As for signatures, itâs basically leaving a little personal calling card at the end of a post. Google Forum Signatures for examples better than what I can provide.
OP sperged out when P9nda defended himself. It was a total shit show. Thatâs the TL;DR.
The topic was closed because it became about attacking individual people, as opposed to commenting on the state of Unturnedâs video content community. Disliking (and sharing other opinions regarding) the YouTube/Twitch/etc. scene is fine, but the discussion stopped being about that in addition to no longer being civilly-held.
There was also an unusually-high number of flags coming out of the topic (some of which staff agreed with for being off-topic one-liners).
This, tbh. @MoltonMontro
that means absolutely nothing since literally all but one of Peskyâs comments got flagged in a thread of mine, if you havenât realized people use the flag option not as a report button, but as a super downvote.
I believe Yarrr said that the OP abused the flag system.
I use the flag as a means to report distasteful comments. And recently, and unsurprisingly, all of them have been on @Pesticideâs posts which have now been removed by staff.
tmw tophat liked your post
Nice callout, are you sure youâre unbiased?
Yes.
This is the only one I have screenshotted and is also directed towards SnaXD.
Huh I canât really argue against that. Honestly donât even know who SnaXD is
Why⌠@Pesticide is really funny. I mean come on, why discriminate against us shitposters?
Iâm not discriminating against shitposters. Atleast read my replies in this thread.
Because SnaXD is a massive coward! if heâs using the report button to flag off comments he doesnât like, then clearly and evidently, heâs a massive pussy!
also howâs that attacking? thatâs more of insult than attack
Because youâre not being civil. Also the picture Iâve posted and the reply youâve made pretty much shows it.
Attacking and insulting are loose terms when it comes to discourse or debate. Youâre actively disregarding the forum guidelines despite the obvious warning of your flagged then removed posts.
From what Iâm seeing youâre defending your guideline-breaking posts as if it does not apply to you.
Are you implying that you should have special exceptions?
Can we block some people from talking in this thread
fuck it you win
except forâŚ
No, i donât have special exceptions for breaking guidelines.
Plus, when have i said i have âspecial exceptionsâ? never have i said i have special privileges for shitposting or name calling people, its just when i see some retard thinking we should have a safe space or mass flagging people is when i jump on the train and start calling him/her out.
Then I am right.
Never said you have.
edit:
In conclusion, it seems that justly flagged posts are just a slap in the wrist that gets your post hidden, deleted, and/or a thread locked. There is relatively not a big of a consequence when it comes to flagged posts.
Should the flagging system be changed, having bigger consequences; or stay the way it is?
Iâve heard of people flagging stuff they simply donât like, thatâs terrible and staff members should crack down on it.