Unturned II seems a bit strange, not opposed to it though, I do think it would be nice to be like this - Unturned 4.0, naming Unturned, Unturned Classic, and naming 2.0, Unturned Legacy. But if you choose to use Unturned II it is still a nice name.
This is a true community feedback based game.
Please read my whole post, I suggested to rename Unturned 2.0 to Legacy and rename 3.0 to classic.
Canâ t you make it that itâs still Unturned in steam and you need to select a bèta code to play Unturned 3.0, Like it is done with Unturned 1.1 and Untuned 2.2.5?
3.0 and 4.0 will be separate games
This would be the worst possible way to handle the transition from Unturned 3 to 4.x. Itâd be incredibly messy.
As said before and repeated, 4.0 will be a game on itself. And 3.0 will be a game on itself.
Oh didnât know that, I thought Nelsons wasnât sure what he wanted.
Thx for the information
No problem
Why not the following naming:
1.0 - Unturned Antique (existing name)
2.0 - Unturned Classic (existing name)
3.0 - Unturned Legacy
4.0 - Unturned
Or, potentially, as an alternative perhaps keeping 3.0âs name static and changing 4.0 to something reflecting a reiteration of the game, such as âUnturned: Horizonâ or something along those lines.
This topic was automatically closed 28 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.