Alright, time to cool off.
15 Likes
But what about a game like PUBG? If played that with a friend and have seen many hackers, even though the game costs $30
The problem with PUBG is that players can literally make money on the game by collection BP, receiving crates, and selling those crates for around $.50-$1.00. That way, these hackers can collect tons of BP, sell crates, and then just gift the game to a different account and put the cheats on there.
Itâs also worth noting that saying a paywall doesnât stop hackers is just as bad as saying it will completely stops hackers. No paywall, anti-cheat, etc. will ever be advanced or good enough to prevent people from trying to gain an advantage over someone else, that is completely true. But that doesnât mean no one will be stopped. A HUGE portion of hackers in PUBG are chinese players, which make up nearly 60% of the entire playerbase. Unturned is a much smaller game, and its demographic caters to younger children, for the most part. Some of these children go and download free hacks because they are not mature enough to understand the consequences of their actions. Yes, you can argue that âwell a lot of hacks are paid tooâ, but you must also realize that these are still children. They donât have jobs to sustain themselves. Any parent in their right mind, no matter how much they spoil the little brat of theirs, will ever sustain a child buying the same game over and over again because their accounts are getting banned.
Of course, not all hackers are necessarily little children, but I believe with the demographic that Unturned has, it is safe to say at least 1/3 of the âhacker populationâ in Unturned is composed of younger children. Adding a paywall could be beneficial in this regard.
3 Likes
Ok, no offense but right now you just offense half of the young population of unturned half the time children in unturned are young yes but not all of them hack tho.And why you mention kids in this discussion remember the population of hacker that is kids are growing up they realized that it bad and left it behind.
And also if they did a method where they basically regift an account with a game that $30,$20 and so on they are going to be more hacker, again and again, you get what I mean it does not matter anyway.
I never said half the young people in Unturned hack. I said half the people who hack are young. There is quite a difference between those two statements. And I mention children because it is well known that a majority of the community compromises of younger children. I am not saying that is a bad thing at all, but you canât hide facts for the sake of âbeing niceâ
5 Likes
itâs a case different from unturnedâs, since itâs a more famous game genre (at the moment)
Good Idea, this would reduce a population of noobs
Your idea seems quite interesting. But maybe make it free for those who bought the gold upgrade for 3.x, because now, it doesnât have much of a use.
This thread should have been titled âSince Unturned 4.X will be a completely separate game from 3.X, not a different version like 1 or 2, should it be marketed to a slightly different demographic than the earlier versions by making it paidâ would have cleared up so many misunderstandings.
I think that Unturned 4.x being paid would be a great idea. It would keep all the players that are not active on Unturned out and keep a solid active community on the game.
I think that the game should still be paid to gold members because it would help Nelson out. If the game were to be paid it would also help with people trolling and hacking.
4.0 should be paid.
Maybe we shouldnât reply to people about an argument that had been left be for two months. Obviously people had been willing to let it go.
As much as I would have thought that pay to play unturned would have been horrible, I have to agree. The community is horrible, and making 4.0 early access would be a great idea. A lot of people who treat unturned 3.0 like Garryâs mod darkrp would just be telling Nelson about how the âpvpâ is broken and I think that it should be pay to play until it is a stable game.
I think that if Nelson makes unturned 4.0 pay to play forever, then everyone would just stick to 3.0. One last thing, maybe the people who bought the 5 dollar DLC should get in on the open beta as it would get more people to buy gold which would fund Nelson on developing the game as well as getting more people to try out 4.0
1 Like
Quite honestly, I get where youâre coming from⌠However there are some die hard fans of this game that donât exactly have the means to do any purchases, e.g meâŚ
What about rust? Itâs not free and still the community is just a bunch of toxic edgy teens and squeakers
2 Likes
Isnât Rust full of naked people?
Paid 4.x? Sound beautiful!
This are pros and cons in my head:
Pros:
+Less toxic people
+Less hackers
+Again we are supporting nelson by buying the game
Cons:
-Community would get smaller
Thats just what i could think of
I like how this whole topic is you guys arguingâŚOi I am sorry I mean âdebatingâ for a price of a game that isnât even out yetâŚor better yet even finished. I thought this was a forum for suggestion things to make the game better, not a place where money is involved.
lol
4.x has to be out if we want to âargueâ or âdebateâ
Well, it can be seen as âsuggesting the game to be paid forâ
It counts as a suggestion and it is part of the game
I agree that it shouldnât be discussed now because itâs kinda too early, but still. We like to involve everything
2 Likes